Literacy with an Attitude - Finn
I really enjoyed this reading. I felt that it finally got at one of the biggest issues in education, economic status and how it affects students' education.
As I read I broke up the classes into the three sections that Anyon did and I created this little table:
|
Working Class
|
Middle Class
|
Upper Class
|
Comments about Knowledge
|
one student mentioned “think”
|
learn, remember, facts, study, smartness, intelligent, know, school, study, brains
|
open to discovery, think, figuring out stuff, you can make knowledge
|
Dominant Theme
|
resistance
|
possibility
|
excellence, individualism, humanitarianism
|
Work
|
follow direction, quiet
|
getting right answer from text or teacher
|
think for oneself, creativity, discovery
|
Learning
|
to follow directions, do mechanical, low-paying work,
|
follow orders and do the mental work that keeps society producing and running smoothly, cooperation
|
create products and art, negotiate from powerful position, masters of the universe
|
I thought about this in reference to the type of schooling I had, and the type of schools I have taught in. I identified with the themes that Anyon found, and as Finn said are still present in education today. I thought about this also in reference to our upcoming paper. I recognized a lot of my middle-class background coming out in my teaching style. "Knowledge in the middle-class was "more conceptual"... more a matter of gaining information and understanding from socially approved sources." (pg. 13). When thinking about the type of questions I pose to my students or have been posed to me they are mostly questions that can be answered by looking in the text or referring to what the teacher has said. "You got the right answer by following directions, but the directions allowed for some choice, some figuring, some decision making, and the teacher explained the purpose of assignments and why the directions would lead to the right answer." (pg. 13) This quote really ties in with how math was taught, and how I was taught math. You follow the steps that the teacher gives you, if you follow the step correctly you get the right answer. Now, I do see a shift in math instruction, there is more reasoning abstractly, modeling and strategy that goes into it. Students are now having to problem solve and discover the algorithm instead of just being told it. Students are being asked why. This is probably how students in elite schools have been learning for a while, and now we are asking all schools to teach this way with the Common Core. I think that teachers are struggling because they think that their "lower" students can't handle mathematical reasoning. "the teacher in one working-class school commented that she skipped pages dealing with mathematical reasoning and inferences because they were too hard." (pg. 10). This is probably the same issues that teachers and parents are dealing with when it comes to the Common Core. But I think it is learned behavior, if we create a culture of "anti-dialogue," (pg. 169) how can we expect our students to reason abstractly and make inferences when we have been shutting them down for so long. Freire's method in Brazil was dialogue, get people invested and concerned through dialogue and they will strive for an education, they will strive for literacy because they will have something to say and they will want to be heard.
"It was about empowering the powerless as a class so they can stand up for themselves." (pg. 172).
There is a game here as Johnson said, and we need to empower the powerless so they can take a place within this game.